Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by si...@poole.ch: > > And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the results > of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847>> which a) > states that the attribution is be default expanded, and b) that should > be the case "> whereever possible" > which in our understanding> > > limits the use of a default collapsed attribution to cases where it is > physically impossible to show the expanded version, for example very > small map snippets. In 2014 we felt that this was acceptable (we don't > have an formal statement on this iirc), and I would go out on a limb and > say that it would still be considered a reasonable guideline.> > > Thanks for pointing me to it! I commented there about two cases where Mapbox itself is using OSM data without attribution.
Hopefully this time I will get an useful reply from Mapbox (so far I tried contacting support but I got no useful reply since 24th January) - though after 4 years author of diary entry may no longer work at Mapbox. If anyone has idea how to contact somebody at Mapbox who is able to fix missing attributions in Mapbox examples/docs - let me know.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
