Here's another example by Uber. They attribute the tiles visibly, not
OSM... how can we measure if it's 50% OSM? we can't
https://movement.uber.com/cities?lang=en-US test in multiple cities
around the world and compare side by side with OSM. clearly more than
50%. Not to mention they mix all the attribution no matter which city
you are viewing.
Às 15:37 de 09/09/2019, Mateusz Konieczny escreveu:
9 Aug 2019, 10:41 by si...@poole.ch:
consolidate all attribution guidance in to one document
Thanks for work on that!
Unfortunately proposed version contains
major loophole that will be deliberately
exploited by organisation like Facebook
or Maps.me or Mapbox that describe
OSM data as their own.
"If OpenStreetMap data accounts for a minority (less than 50%) part of
the visible map rendering, attribution with other sources on a
separate page that is visible after user interaction is acceptable."
In basically any readable map less that 50% of
visible map rendering is using OSM data
or can be trivially modified to do it.
For example - claim that land area is not
from OSM data but default map state
or use alternative data for land boundaries.
----
Note that claim that this companies* will
use ridiculous loopholes is not prediction,
they are doing it already or simply lying.
Mapbox representative explicitly claimed in
mail to me that hiding attribution behind i
buttons fulfills ODBL requirements.
FB and mapsme ignored multiple reports
about their attribution violation.
*and other, but in this cases I reported their
illegal use of work of OSM mappers and got
ignored.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
