On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 02:15 Jeffrey Friedl, <jfri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > And the hypocrisy goes on. "Strava launches gorgeous new outdoor maps" > https://blog.mapbox.com/strava-launches-gorgeous-new-outdoor-maps-977c74cf37f9 > > I'm not sure what you're reporting, but the maps all have "© Mapbox © > OpenStreetMap" in the lower-left > corner. (Perhaps they were cut off in some of the screenshots in news > coverage, but the actual maps in > the Strava app and on their web site all have this attribution.) I > suppose that they could use a slightly > stronger background shadow, to create more contrast when the map behind > the attribution is light. > *that is not true. https://twitter.com/mastermen/status/1127672128797663239?s=09 <https://twitter.com/mastermen/status/1127672128797663239?s=09>* *I have reported that to them and obviously didn't get a reply from their side. * *from the moment they use OSM they agreed with it's terms and the reasonable calculated notice (which they don't have on the example of the Medium article 8 shared). a corporate member of OSMF not knowing and not complying with the attribution is a bad example. *
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
