> As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via Mapbox), Snapchat > that is using OSM without attribution requirements (funnily there's plenty > of space for a reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and text). > They probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to comply over a > year ago, nor have agreed with the license in every aspect of it when > stated using OSM data, nor read Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on > these repeated offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing lists, > nor that they had a employee that ran for OSMF board. > > https://map.snapchat.com/ > > Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is going on for over a > year with these two companies that are corporate members of OSMF and should > be the first ones to give examples. Enough with excuses. >
The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has anything to do with Facebook. Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
