23 Dec 2019, 17:59 by joost.schou...@gmail.com:
>
>
>>
>> As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via Mapbox),
>> Snapchat that is using OSM without attribution requirements (funnily
>> there's plenty of space for a reasonable and visible calculated
>> mapbox logo and text). They probably don't know, nor that they have
>> been asked to comply over a year ago, nor have agreed with the
>> license in every aspect of it when stated using OSM data, nor read
>> Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on these repeated offenders, nor
>> read the multiples reports in mailing lists, nor that they had a
>> employee that ran for OSMF board.
>>
>>
>> https://map.snapchat.com/
>>
>>
>> Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is going on for
>> over a year with these two companies that are corporate members of
>> OSMF and should be the first ones to give examples. Enough with
>> excuses.
>>
>>
>
> The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do things. If
> there's space for Mapbox, there's space for OpenStreetMap. But I don't think
> Snapchat has anything to do with Facebook.
>
> Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook.
>
It is quite hard to find place where one
may report this kind of info using email.
I used pr...@snap.com - is anyone aware
of any better email address for this kind of reports?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
