Hi Mateusz,
They don't. Here's all my email exchange with them from October 2018,
yes _*2018*_. it's more than enough with evidence and time to be fixed.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/110XubCe0kd2HNtbqXS7U_vr44xyieaSt/view?usp=sharing
On 24/12/2019 07:08, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Have they responded with anything
(except automatic reply) ?
Is there an assigned issue id?
23 Dec 2019, 21:32 by nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com:
I sent this situation to Mapbox 10 months ago.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:00 joost schouppe,
<joost.schou...@gmail.com <mailto:joost.schou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via
Mapbox), Snapchat that is using OSM without attribution
requirements (funnily there's plenty of space for a
reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and text).
They probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to
comply over a year ago, nor have agreed with the license
in every aspect of it when stated using OSM data, nor read
Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on these repeated
offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing
lists, nor that they had a employee that ran for OSMF board.
https://map.snapchat.com/
Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is
going on for over a year with these two companies that are
corporate members of OSMF and should be the first ones to
give examples. Enough with excuses.
The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do
things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for
OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has anything to do
with Facebook.
Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
