I sent this situation to Mapbox 10 months ago. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:00 joost schouppe, <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via Mapbox), Snapchat >> that is using OSM without attribution requirements (funnily there's plenty >> of space for a reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and text). >> They probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to comply over a >> year ago, nor have agreed with the license in every aspect of it when >> stated using OSM data, nor read Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on >> these repeated offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing lists, >> nor that they had a employee that ran for OSMF board. >> >> https://map.snapchat.com/ >> >> Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is going on for over >> a year with these two companies that are corporate members of OSMF and >> should be the first ones to give examples. Enough with excuses. >> > > The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do things. If > there's space for Mapbox, there's space for OpenStreetMap. But I don't > think Snapchat has anything to do with Facebook. > > Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook. >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
