I have no problem with big bounding boxes that result from editing large objects. I get annoyed by the ones where somebody added twontiny houses on opposite sides of the world.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020, 20:40 Mark Wagner, <mark+...@carnildo.com> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 08:03:11 +0200 > Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:19:46AM -0400, James wrote: > > > No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can > > > become quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is > > > quick and easy, but span over multiple kms > > > > The point is that the line/way of that road should also not span tens > > of kms. You should break that up every couple of kilometers. > > > > Otherwise this is prone to break one day or the other. And its simply > > inefficient. Every time you touch that road you invalidate hundrets > > of tiles. > > Come out to the rural United States sometime. It's not unreasonable > for a road to span tens of kilometers between intersections. > > (And a one-square-kilometer limit on landuse is also unreasonable: the > most common farm shape is a circle one mile in diameter. The > second-most-common is a square one mile on a side.) > > -- > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
