On 2020-08-01 12:42, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Ruffle is showing promise (https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle) and is > under very active development, but does not yet support AS3 or the Flash > Player features that P2 needs. I would anticipate that P2 will be able > to run as WebAssembly when Ruffle reaches feature parity with AIR 2.6.
Yes, exactly, that's one of the two approaches I had in mind: rewriting from scratch preferably also in Rust (which obviously wouldn't fit in the proposed budget or timeframe), or use Ruffle with the existing code. I'm wondering if some of the changes that are now needed for AIR would make it more difficult to switch to Ruffle later on. I clearly see AIR as some temporary solution to keep running even after Dec 2020, as long as Ruffle isn't ready yet. In a more mid-term, I really like to see a move away from such proprietary platforms to an editor that runs in a browser out-of-the-box. I'm a bit worried about AIR being (too) difficult to install and run for an average Potlatch user, but that's just a gut feeling. -- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
