Am Fr., 21. Apr. 2023 um 09:47 Uhr schrieb Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:11:49PM +0100, Andy Townsend wrote: > > To change "shop=veryrarevalue" where it was correct to > > "shop=lessrarevalue"without preserving the detail somehow loses detail > from > > OSM and is therefore by definition a Bad Thing. Some of the entries on > your > > I disagree with that blanket "Bad Thing". It is much more likely that a > general map will show shop=lessrarevalue with a specific icon than > shop=veryrarevalue. So if you are using shop=veryrarevalue instead of > shop=lessrarevalue you might lose detail in the database, but in > practice you will gain detail in actual use. > what we actually want is both, a reasonably generic/specific value for a "main" class, and potentially additional tag(s) for details. Rather than just replacing shop=veryrarevalue with shop=moregenericvalue, we should probably also add moregenericvalue=veryrarevalue Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
