Hello Paul! On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36 AM, you wrote:
AS>> Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of AS>> editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system. > Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be > bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say the other > editors are correct and the TB is wrong. The reverse is also true. > They _are_ different. So, I prefer MicroEd for email to anything else. I prefer it, also. And I do believe that one could as easily infer that the "silent majority" of TB! users prefer MicroEd, as one could infer the opposite. I have seen only a vocal minority against it, from time to time, myself, whether in threads on TBBETA or in threads on TBTECH. (I am still reading every post on every TB! list--just call me obsessively engaged! :) ) > I also use OpenOffice and WordPerfect and MetaPad and Notepad. Each > has its strengths and weaknesses. I certainly don't expect each to > conform to a single set of conventions. If they did, we would have no > need for all but one of them. I am certain you do not want to be just > like me and I can assure you the reverse is also true! 8-} :) Well said. I use Open Office sometimes, and sometimes I use Word 2000--and I don't mind switching between them, depending on my needs. Further, sometimes I use Notepad and sometimes I use SmartBat. :) And sometimes I use Marck D. Pearlstone's BrainStorm. However, so well does MicroEd meet my needs, that I have never considered using anything else for composing e-mail messages--ever since I got TB! and abandoned Eudora Pro 4.0 and Outlook Express, in October, 2002. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.5.0.31 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
