-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 @ 03:30:45 +0100 [ Mon, 19 Nov 2001], Carsten Thönges [CT] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... CT> I'm using 1.54/10e. You use 1.54/10. Could there be differences?
I changed to the 10e beta and this is what I get with your template as is. ,----- snip -- | I'm using 1.54/10e. You use 1.54/10. Could there be differences? | | Who else has these problems?'----- snip -- When I make the changes I mentioned, this is what I now get. ,----- snip -- | I'm using 1.54/10e. You use 1.54/10. Could there be differences? | | Who else has these problems? '----- snip -- The difference persists. The editor behaves so strangely in this beta that I have to revert back to beta 10. - -- ŠAllie C Martin -- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1 [MUA: TB! v1.54/10e (*) OS: Win2K SP 2] __ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Sealed for Security iEUEARECAAYFAjv4dZIACgkQV8nrYCsHF+IK8QCcDEnE6rG5/Kma/1hPTfxRLp4Q E/kAljtse08rxrXOR0RLGZRWUxsBq7U= =3mQV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
