Thursday, February 10, 2000, 9:34:24 AM, Syafril wrote:
SL>> You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL>> the original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL>> what they actually did.
> At the time the "high priority" arrive, we know the author need
> attention for his/her message (that is his/her priority), but after that
> it depend on us to decide the message is "high priority" to answer or
> not, doesn't it ?
SL>> You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL>> the original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL>> what they actually did.
I will continue to C&P that block of text until you understand exactly it
is that was said.
> Any complaint from Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook200 about this
> "feature" yet ?
This is TB!, not Eudora/Netscape/Pegasus/Outlook2000. If I wanted to use
one of those abominations I would do so. Please kindly STOP trying to make
TB! into its flawed competitors.
SL>> No, wait, wait, let's go for a scale based on currently know prime
SL>> number! Yeah!!! Yeah!!!! That's it! 5 levels isn't enough for me,
SL>> let's go for 3249827532459872345983427!!!!
SL>> Do you get it yet?
> Whoaho ...
Apparently not. *YOU* are happy with 5. Someone else wants 7. Another
person wants 23908712598137653295678. So where do you draw the line? How
about not starting down that path in the first place.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
