Hello TBUDL, I am receiving notices of abuse on email sent to the TBUDL. As an example I have included one of the notices in the forwarded message below.
Any ideals what is causing this, and how to eliminate. TIA! -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 This is a forwarded message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, July 15, 2002, 3:15:41 AM Subject: BLACK-HAT: We do not accept mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [WORLDLESS.NET] ===8<==============Original message text=============== O!Y There might not be anything wrong with your mail...but... Your relay [63.99.209.9] home.worldless.net is well known for relaying of spam - your mail is blocked or simply deleted at server stage. More info: http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=63.99.209.9 ============================ Failing Message ============================== From: Greg Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 15, 2002, 6:07:37 AM Subject: Trouble checking mail with ALT F2 ========================= Original message text =========================== Hello Allie, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 9:49:54 PM, you wrote: ACM> Disabling ZA didn't help and it was this part that was most ACM> devastating in terms of the frustration. ACM> There's one good thing that came out of the experience. This was my ACM> sensitization to the fact that adverse software interactions are ACM> common and can be very difficult to pick up since we often blame the ACM> malfunctioning application as the direct cause of the problem. Though ACM> the application itself will usually be the cause of problems confined ACM> to use of the application itself, don't forget the lurking software ACM> interaction ESPECIALLY when others cannot reproduce the problem you're ACM> experiencing. Key words to me appear to be frustration, sensitization, & interaction. Been there & did that. Little OT, but from experience you didn't mention one other important factor/possibility that is of hardware being put in the mix. I had situation between 2 versions of SW installed simultaneously. It was suppose to be ok. The problem was intermittent. Did everything SW company/support engineer told me. I was on CIS forum and somebody had the sure solution. It didn't work. It has clearly been documented by others that installation of both versions of SW can work WITHOUT problems. I began to realize the possibility of hardware being part of the mix of the problem. It is the main reason I run dual boot system to separate the 2 versions of SW to isolate and help solve problem. Never did find the problem, and still occurs intermittently. I did LEARN from the experience. I've took that experience incorporated into use of other software and configuration to provide what I believe to be best solution for running MY system & providing backup. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q/Post5 on Windows 98 ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ ====================== End of original message text ======================= ===8<===========End of original message text=========== ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
