Dear Thomas, @6-Apr-2004, 12:35 +0700 (06-Apr 06:35 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
CB>>> How could information that was intended to curb abuse be CB>>> suspicious? MDP>> Because it does not conform to standards - any standards. TF> Except the RFC dealing with X-headers, I believe. While that's true, there's something about these particular headers that are suspicious. ... <snip> Okay - maybe I didn't think that through completely. MDP>> The list server software hasn't got a clue what they are and MDP>> can't read English. It just sees them as non-standard and MDP>> therefore suspicious. TF> That's a bug in the list server software then. It should ignore TF> any X-headers it doesn't have a clue about. Usually it does - but not these. TF> IMHO. Instead, it chooses to raise an arbitrary alarm that TF> cannot even be turned off. Here's why I think they really are suspicious - they are multiple. Surely any X header should only appear once. In these messages there are 6 X-AntiAbuse: headers. That just can't be right! -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
