Dear Thomas, @6-Apr-2004, 14:23 +0700 (06-Apr 08:23 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
TF>>> the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course. MDP>> It's open source - you get what you pay for! TF> I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-) Precisely! :-). So that's the ultimate worth in terms of value. MDP>> I'm not about to rewrite the module myself TF> Now I am really disappointed. :-( Now I'm at a loss. I hate to think of leaving you in such an emotional state! What to do. What to do? :-( MDP>> and the team responsible don't care so we're stuck with it. TF> In that case, we should just write another list server software TF> and compete with them, what do you think? It's a thought, isn't it? Let me think about it a bit more. Okay - I've thought. FORGET IT! ;-). ... <snip> MDP>> I still think that more than one instance of an X-header has MDP>> to be a violation of RFC. I haven't read up on it yet so MDP>> CMIIW. TF> I'll read up on that when I have the time. Since I am working on TF> my MBA thesis during today's holiday, searching the RFCs for TF> something not MBA-related might be a welcome break. Okay. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/14 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
