Hello Marck, On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 08:09:14 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 14:09 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course. MDP> It's open source - you get what you pay for! I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-) MDP> I'm not about to rewrite the module myself Now I am really disappointed. :-( MDP> and the team responsible don't care so we're stuck with it. In that case, we should just write antoher list server software and compete with them, what do you think? MDP> Hence my request to the person whose mails are causing the problem MDP> to clean it up at their end. This may be the easiest (and this case sensible) solution indeed. In the future, we should point out that "die to a shortcoming blabla" and not make it look like it's the sender's fault - but ensure that he understands how to help. I agree with you that no other way seems to be realistic at the moment. MDP> I still think that more than one instance of an X-header has to MDP> be a violation of RFC. I haven't read up on it yet so CMIIW. I'll read up on that when I have the time. Since I am working on my MBA thesis during today's holiday, searching the RFCs for something not MBA-related might be a welcome break. I cc'ed to TBOT, but don't know whether YahooGroups will accept this address as the secondary address by now. If not, please reply to the OT part of this message (which dwarfs the on-topic part) over there. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Signs Your Co-Worker Is A Hacker: Instead of the "Welcome" voice on AOL, you overhear, "Good Morning, Mr./Mrs. President." Message reply created with The Bat! 2.05 Beta/12 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
