Hallo Jim, On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:26:26 -0500GMT (19-8-2009, 14:26 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
JK> Next I restored the tick mark for numbering on the account, after JK> modifying the reply template in the AB to indicate that it's JK> indeed the AB template (as you can see in the signature) -- and JK> behold, the numbering in the subject line is back again despite JK> the "%SingleRe%-" line in the template! My tb-groups template uses %singlere and my account properties have numbering enabled (just for testing purposes) and that's working for replies without an address book template. So the macro does its work. JK> Could it be the positioning of the macro within the template? Should it be JK> somewhere else, possibly before the "account" one? The puzzle is getting JK> interesting even though it's somewhat off topic for the original thread... I haven't got any address book templates that use the %Account= macro Why are you using it, do you filter your tbudl messages to a common filter? -- Groetjes, Roelof Postscript: The only thing of interest in some letters. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.2.10.1 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM
pgpfCCkfCunV3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html