On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:31:30PM +0000, NextGen$ wrote: > > As I said previously, I don't think that Up&p support is a good idea :/ > > It's the eternal tradeoff between hidding a node and ease to use. If we > implement UP&P support, I strongly suggest that we implement Bonjour support > (apple's discovery protocol) too. And possibly Zeroconf
What's the problem? We're only talking to the router, right? > > > > > > > > > What do you think about my thoughts? > > > > > > > > Is any of the developers available to be my mentor? > > > > > > I will gladly answer any questions any would-be freenet developer has on > > > how the code works in order to assist them in building useful features. If > > > you want to apply for Google SoC then by all means do, but it looks like > > > there will be some competition. > > If I'm allowed to be both a mentor and an applicant, I may help too. > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Thomas King > > Nextgen$ -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060424/9a9c70c9/attachment.pgp>
