Paul Graydon <p...@paulgraydon.co.uk> writes:
> On 08/24/2010 02:25 PM, Doug Hughes wrote:
>>
>> You're right. I confused secure erasing (which no longer requires many
>> passes, even though it remains part of the common cargo-cult lore), with
>> recovery under normal circumstances. It is plausible, that normal
>> non-erased data could be recovered with a controller change on different
>> commonly used drive models of similar types.
>
> That one whizzed past my head with an audible whooshing sound.  Since when
> does secure erasing no longer require multiple passes?

The current Australian standards only require a single pass for disks post
2001, or larger than 15GB, with an arbitrary pattern followed by read-back
verification.  (...or an approved degauser.)

This covers everything including top secret labeled storage; see §6.2.92 of
the ISM Sep 09, although I understand it has been this way for a while.

    http://www.dsd.gov.au/library/infosec/acsi33.html

        Daniel
-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ dan...@rimspace.net            ☎ +61 401 155 707
               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to