Paul Graydon <p...@paulgraydon.co.uk> writes: > On 08/24/2010 02:25 PM, Doug Hughes wrote: >> >> You're right. I confused secure erasing (which no longer requires many >> passes, even though it remains part of the common cargo-cult lore), with >> recovery under normal circumstances. It is plausible, that normal >> non-erased data could be recovered with a controller change on different >> commonly used drive models of similar types. > > That one whizzed past my head with an audible whooshing sound. Since when > does secure erasing no longer require multiple passes?
The current Australian standards only require a single pass for disks post 2001, or larger than 15GB, with an arbitrary pattern followed by read-back verification. (...or an approved degauser.) This covers everything including top secret labeled storage; see §6.2.92 of the ISM Sep 09, although I understand it has been this way for a while. http://www.dsd.gov.au/library/infosec/acsi33.html Daniel -- ✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ dan...@rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707 ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/