Re: [oswg] yes, a licensing discussion

[terry]

On 24 Oct, Deb Richardson wrote:

>>      3) must allow translations into other languages.
>> as a mandatory freedom.
> 
> Hm.  Is this allowed in the majority of currently available licenses?  I
> think it's a good idea, but I want to restrict the number of allowable
> licenses as little as possible.

To be honest I am not sure.
I personally treat translations into other languages as "derived works"
for the purposes of my own document licensing. But I am not sure if this
is technically correct, from a legal perspective or not.

Terry

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]