On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 06:28 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC the text in fact uses "unaddressed" specifically *instead* of
> > saying "open", as a slight fudge for cases where a bug might still be
> > open but is in fact fully 'addressed'. We *are* reducing the likelihood
> > of that scenario with this change (i.e. we can't say "go" if a fix is
> > in the compose but not yet pushed stable any more), but I'm not 100%
> > sure we've removed any possibility of a bug being in this state
> > somehow. So I'm not 100% against this change but a bit worried by it.

> OK, so what about this?
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AKparal%2FDraft%3AGo_No_Go_Meeting&diff=436435&oldid=436434

Looks fine.

> > > I also switched GOLD to GO, which seems to be an oversight from the
> > > past.
> > It's not, exactly. The two terms sort of coexist, it wasn't just that
> > we switched from saying "gold" to saying "go" at some point.
> > Conceptually it's the *release candidate* specifically that gets
> > declared "gold", while the *release process* is "go" (or we are "go for
> > release") if the candidate is declared "gold". I think we could at
> > least *conceptually* declare a release candidate "GOLD" but not be "go"
> > for release. It's kinda unnecessary to have both concepts, but the text
> > reads slightly awkwardly if you simply do s/GOLD/GO/g/ as you did,
> > because we don't really "declare the release "GO"", that's a somewhat
> > odd phrasing.
> > 
> > I don't really mind if we want to rephrase this a bit to drop the
> > 'gold' concept - we barely use it anywhere else but on this page - but
> > it feels like it should be a separate change, not part of this
> > revision, and it should be slightly more than just a search-n-replace
> > so the text doesn't read weird :)

> OK, I reverted this.

Thanks! So for me this is good to go.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to