Sir, Thank you very much.Can I request for very simple sentences without the Sanskrit blend
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:40 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pranam > The adaptability of cost ,profit, Mathematics are all placed in > one flow ,aspiring from one angle, based on certain individual definitions. > > Maths > > Upapatti and "Proof" > > In the introduction to the section on spherics (Golādhyāya) of his > treatise Siddhāntaśiromaõi, Bhāskarācārya II explains the central purpose > behind his exposition of upapattis: > > मद्यध्याम् धुसधाम् यदत्र गनिथम् छ योपपतिम्विन > > प्रोउदेएम् प्रोउद सभसु नोउति गनको निस्सम्सयो निस्वयम् > > गोले सा विमला करामलकवथ् प्रत्यसथो स्रुयते > > समध्यम् युपपति बोध्यवितये गोलप्रबन्ध्योथ: > > Without the knowledge of upapattis, by merely mastering the calculations > (gaõita) described here, from the madhyamādhikāra (the first chapter of > Siddhāntaśiromaõi) onwards, of the [motion of the] heavenly bodies, a > mathematician will not be respected in the scholarly assemblies; without > the upapattis he himself will not be free of doubt (niÜsa§śaya). Since > upapatti is clearly perceivable in the (armillary) sphere like a berry in > the hand, I therefore begin the Golādhyāya (section on spherics) to > explain the upapattis. > > The same is echoed by the Gaõeśa Daivajña in his famous commentary > Buddhivilāsinī (c.1540) on Bhāskarācārya’s Līlāvatī: > > Without upapatti, whatever is stated in vyakta-gaõita (mathematics > dealing with manifest quantities – arithmetic and geometry) or > avyakta-gaõita (mathematics dealing with un-manifest quantities – > algebra), will not be rendered free from confusion (nirbhrānta); nor will > it have any value in an assembly of mathematicians. Upapatti is indeed > directly and pleasantly perceivable like a mirror in hand. It is therefore, > as also for the elevation of the intellect, that I proceed to enunciate > upapattis in entirety. Thus, the notion of upapatti seems to be > significantly different from the notion of "proof" as understood in the > Greco-European tradition of mathematics. According to the Indian > mathematical texts, the purpose of upapatti is mainly: (i) to remove > confusion and doubts regarding the validity and interpretation of > mathematical results and procedures; and, (ii) to obtain assent in the > community of mathematicians. This is very different from the ideal of > "proof" in the Greco-European tradition which is to irrefutably establish > the absolute truth of a mathematical proposition. Further, in the Indian > tradition, mathematical knowledge is not taken to be different in any > fundamental sense from that in natural sciences. In fact, valid means for > acquiring and validating mathematical knowledge are the same as in other > sciences: Pratyakùa (perception), Anumāna (inference), Śabda or Agama > (authentic text or tradition). > > However, there are no instances where Indian mathematicians use > the method of indirect proof to establish the existence of an entity, the > existence of which is not demonstrable (even in principle) by other > (direct) means of verification. In this sense, the Indian mathematical > tradition may be seen as adopting what is nowadays referred to as the > "constructivist" approach to the issue of mathematical existence. It is > important to note that this significant feature of Indian mathematical > tradition is closely related to the world-view of the Naiyāyikas or Indian > logicians, who do not accord tarka (or the method of indirect proof) the > status of an independent source of valid knowledge (pramāõa). Indeed the > general philosophical approach of Indian logicians is one of eliminating > from logical discourse all reference to such aprasiddha or un-instantiated > entities, whose existence is not even in principle accessible to direct > means of verification. In fact, the Naiyāyikas would even reconcile to live > with contradictions rather than allow the use of such aprasiddha entities > in their logical discourse. This is brought out very clearly by Matilal > by citing an important passage from Ātmatattvaviveka of Udayanācārya (c. > 10th century) which deals with an argument between the Bauddhas and > Naiyāyika. HENCE THERE IS NOTHING THAT CANNOT BE MEASURED BY THE > MATHEMATICS AND NUMBERS; THE COMPUTER LANGUAGE CODED IN TERMS OF THE > MATHEMATICAL “0” AND “1”, IS NOTHING BUT ORIGIN OF siva and shakthi as 1 > and 0. Mathematics can express all including the negative numbers. Brahmam > is one and the negative energy @ MAYA or PRAKRITHI OR SHAKTI is shunya. > > 2 Cost reduction is the achievement of real and permanent reduction in > unit cost of products manufactured. It therefore continuously attempts to > achieve genuine savings in cost of production, distribution, selling and > administration. It does not accept a standard or budget as impenetrable or > fixed, it rather challenges the standards or budgets continuously to make > improvements in them. “Cost reduction” is a continuous process of critical > cost examination, analysis and challenge of standards. In this each aspect > of businesses such as products, process, procedures, methods, organization, > personnel etc., are critically examined and reviewed with a view of > improving efficiency and effectiveness and reducing the costs. Cost > reduction begins where cost control ends. Cost control seeks to bring the > actuals in harmony with the predetermined targets. If this happens, > assuming no increase or decrease in costs, the profit margin becomes more > or less fixed at a particular level of sales. However, this is easier said > than done. In actual practice, prices may fluctuate. Alternatively, sales > may decline due to various reasons. In all these cases, the business must > aim at maximising profits at the same level of sales by reducing costs. > Cost reduction seeks to achieve a permanent reduction in cost, without > impairing the quality of the product. It is a planned way of improving the > efficiency of business operations. > > 1 Cost reduction is confined to genuine savings in costs of > manufacture, administration, distribution and selling. ( has the limitation > subject to many factors external, which would not keep at the byoyancy > level, at the same standard cost. ). > > 2 Reduction in cost to consumer as a result of reduction in taxation or > Government design or price agreements will not be covered by cost > reduction. These are not real and permanent reductions in cost due to > planned efforts. Cost reduction does not include windfall reduction or > fortuitous reduction. > > 3 . Cost reduction assumes that product or service will retain its > essential characteristics and quality. If reduction in cost results in > deterioration of quality, it will not be covered by the term Cost Reduction. > > 4 Cooperation and teamwork are essential features of any planned approach > to cost reduction. Direct saving of cost is the most tangible objective of > cost reduction, but it profoundly influences the wide sphere of business as > a whole. > HENCE THERE CAN NEVER BE AN UTOPIAN COST REDUCTION AND REDUCING THE PROFIT > , ACCOMADATE EACH INDIVIDUAL. > Therefore an utopian theory of conjecture is at the far away > plane, unnoticeable. Maths would explain all scientifically; when I say > scientifically , it means , the negative numbers cannot have the square > root and one shall not demand the theory of the impossibility. KR IRS 16522 > > On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 06:43, Yeddanapudi Markandeyulu < > yeddanapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> *The Ruin of the Profit Mania* >> >> Cost and Income are the two sides of a coin. When you pay for >> expenditure, to the payee it is income. If costs are reduced, incomes also >> get reduced. If every firm becomes the optimum firm, which means that it >> achieved the lowest cost for a unit of output, there will be no income at >> all in the economy and it will be the ultimate ruin called the great >> depression. If every firm makes profit, all together dive into the abyss. >> >> A loss making unit is one which is giving more to the society than what >> it is taking from the society. In fact the profit making firms are existing >> because; they are maintained by the loss sustaining units. A profit making >> unit gives less than what it takes and the loss making unit, gives more >> than what it takes from the society. >> >> This vital service, which keeps economies safe or save the economy from >> death, is being performed by the Public Sector Undertakings in India. If >> all public sector undertakings are to be gifted to the private merchants, >> and if they begin cutting costs or reduce the income generation in the >> society, there will be the ultimate economic depression, the big ruin. >> >> An economy of 140 crore people needs the vital avenue where loss >> generation or the income generation in the society, is maintained. Loss >> simply means incomes given without the equal return. >> >> There is a very big minus side to the cost reduction, ruin of nature. A >> profit making unit, poisons the land, water, air, and kills the flora and >> fauna, or simply shifts to the society and nature the costs which it has to >> pay. When nature is murdered so systematically and completely, we also die >> gradually. All profit making units together ultimately murder nature. >> >> The Basmasuras of today, sport big academic qualifications surround >> themselves with intellectual statements emitting sycophants, posing as the >> great Dons, leaving no scope for simple sanity. The Dons obfuscate with >> very complicated but really irrelevant mathematics, but they look technical >> and superior. >> >> There is one undeniable fact. You can explain everything with sentences >> but you cannot represent everything with mathematics. Mathematics always >> leaves with incomplete explanations. No single emotion or feeling can be >> quantified. >> >> YM >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thatha_Patty" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqpFg4kYsVghQ4wbv5C5ePdrTPDwVp5BeQ9kaAAmbynXw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqpFg4kYsVghQ4wbv5C5ePdrTPDwVp5BeQ9kaAAmbynXw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- *Mar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCK0-2SmgJBK6Vv2nrH9CD7iNZwX0ni0qh%3DOqRNLwcetTw%40mail.gmail.com.
