On 2019-11-12 07:20 +1300, Bruce Mutton wrote:

> I don't have a problem with the characteristic you mention in point 2.  I 
> think it is just semantics associated with the word 'ignore', and sequential 
> process.  If you think 'break' then is it all OK?

We think it should be possible to specify 'break/ignore' at a point, rather
than a point+direction (i.e. a leg/pair of points)

We want the computer to worry about the 'direction' aspect, and feel
we shouldn't have to. It seems like this should be possible.

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion

Reply via email to