On 2019-11-12 07:20 +1300, Bruce Mutton wrote: > I don't have a problem with the characteristic you mention in point 2. I > think it is just semantics associated with the word 'ignore', and sequential > process. If you think 'break' then is it all OK?
We think it should be possible to specify 'break/ignore' at a point, rather than a point+direction (i.e. a leg/pair of points) We want the computer to worry about the 'direction' aspect, and feel we shouldn't have to. It seems like this should be possible. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion