I'm sure Jax saw your suggestion, but I can feel his pain. Myself, I am very passionate about reducing mouse-clicky-induced-tendinitis o' the finger knuckle. We are going to have generations of people who just can't poke their significant others in the forehead when these significant others deserve a finger-poke in the forehead.
But seriously, distraction-free clickless rock'n rolling when the words and thoughts are flowing like a torential river, that's a pretty wonderful thing. A bit like CamelCase. I'm no fan, but when one just wants to quickly write, avoiding them brackets is a good thing. So I can appreciate wanting to squeeze out every drop of efficiency. Probably a little odd coming from me, because mindless clicking/distractions give me time to process the thoughts into a little bit of coherence. Yeah, I'm a little bit granola, liking the time to smell the flowers. On Sunday, May 2, 2021 at 6:26:08 PM UTC-3 PMario wrote: > On Sunday, May 2, 2021 at 2:04:33 PM UTC+2 isd196...@gmail.com wrote: > >> So, it's looking very much like the buttons are the only way to go with >> this. Shame, but I already have a couple of custom buttons so its not >> exactly a hardship, Id just rather be able to type as normal, save that >> Tiddler and then immediately click on a link to a non-existent tiddler and >> carry on. Oh well. >> > > Did you see my suggestion? You can click on the link of a missing tiddler, > which opens it ... 1st click. > You click the "edit button" ... 2nd click ... done > > What's wrong with that? I'm sure that 1 more click will not cost you more > than half a second in your workflow. ... > > -mario > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6c1cbef8-8d30-4a55-bec9-74aaa36686c4n%40googlegroups.com.
