Thanks for the feedback, Ton and Yakov, I will take them into consideration 
for sure.
I'll be busy and won't be doing much on these plugins for several weeks, 
we'll talk later.

Vincent

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:32:46 PM UTC+8, TonG wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent, 
>
> I played around with your latest prelease and can see future 
> possibilities. 
> On the other hand it would be nice to just have a no frills table 
> editor. Table editing was always very difficult in TW and is now a 
> pleasure with your plugin(s). I'am using the (stable) version 1.4.6 
> daily and there I only miss the keyboard navigation you already 
> implemented in prereleases. A (stable) 1.4.x release with added 
> keyboard navigation would be much appreciated. 
> I second Yakov's remarks about the Edit mode in the prerelease: do not 
> combine general editing with table/headings/list editing. As Yakov 
> already stated: there is no fallback anymore (at the moment you cannot 
> even edit body text). 
>
> Cheers, 
>
> Ton 
>
> On Dec 11, 12:21 pm, Yakov <yakov.litvin.publi...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > Hello :) 
> > 
> >  > Good timing! 
> > 
> > Indeed! 
> > 
> > <<< 
> > Well, during development I noticed that clicking a link can trigger two 
> > actions: opening the link and the edit box, due to event bubbling. But I 
> > didn't like it that way so I introduced the option to restrict it to one 
> > action, either opening the link or opening the edit box. Now I know that 
> > two actions can be expected in some cases, I will figure a way to put it 
> > back. 
> > <<< 
> > 
> > No-no-no, two actions were expected but they are not desired, so 
> everything 
> > is fine. I just want to be sure that there wouldn't be two actions in 
> some 
> > untested situations, that's what I was talking about. But as I 
> understand, 
> > you basically stop bubbling the onclick event, so that shouldn't happen 
> > anyway, right? 
> > 
> > The new alpha looks good, but I have one important question: why did you 
> > move inline editing into the edit mode? On the one hand, inline editing 
> has 
> > this nice feature that one doesn't need to scroll up to the menu -- 
> well, 
> > double-click now makes editor open right in place, but to close edit 
> mode 
> > one has to scroll up and click "done"/"cancel"; on the other hand, with 
> > usual edit mode, one has a usual fallback to edit what is unsupported 
> for 
> > now. I think 
> > * the ordinary edit mode shouldn't be hijacked, but rather two options 
> > should remain 
> > * there should be an option to be "permanently in the inline edit mode", 
> > like it was implemented before 
> > 
> > Best regards, 
> > Yakov. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/xtDZ-hVQuN8J.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.

Reply via email to