TonyM wrote: > > > determining one freely available that can ensure the lions share of > Unicode is available, this is what we must do. >
Right! I been looking at various methods for doing that. I use BabelMap Portable, which is pretty good, to examine the font substitution process. It is highly UNLIKELY with more esoteric glyphs that common fonts will hold them. Though many ARE available on local machines through substitution. What we really need, IMO, is a TW that can be designed so that it itself presents selected Glyphs in various fonts (and ONLY those fonts). The online tools I looked at for this (i.e. seeing precisely which Unicode characters render in which font) are not really adequate to our needs. I'm trying to find a consistent & quick way to answer the issues of font support for TW in TW. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/5b29cb67-df74-4230-a105-a179300f876fo%40googlegroups.com.
