Ciao TonyM & PMario TonyM wrote:
> Here is my initial draft Glyphs 5.1.23-prerelease — Identifying reliable > Unicode Glyphs on TiddlyWiki Build Date (anthonymuscio.github.io) > <https://anthonymuscio.github.io/PreReleaseGlyphs.html> > *TonyM*: That demo shows the issues arising over font support are generic---Not Just for PMario Markup. I think we should pursue the broader scope in a NEW thread. Maybe "Unicode and Font Support in TW". Do you want to start it? I have some solutions in mind. But they are refactory to this thread. *PMario*: I think TonyM is *definitely heading in the right direction* on trying to pin down font support issues for your Custom Markup by illustration. I can see the beginning of a *solution*. One where reliable markup glyphs could be always relied upon whatever platform you are on. It would be *a very minimal font embedded in TW for JUST markup glyphs. It would be kilobytes, not megabytes*. To get to the point of proof-of-concept I need some days yet, but I'm getting close. Its just trudge over the Unicode BMP to establish which fonts would provide the glyphs needed, cost free, to make a good "TW-MarkupGlyphsFont". Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/c592a5aa-d387-4a40-8b8d-2a6d1c2f172fn%40googlegroups.com.
