Puh-leeze, I'm a sometimes contributor but usually lurker here. As someone who believes that variety is intellectually stimulating, I enjoy reading Mr. Sylvester's jibes, ersatz questions, and racially motivated comments. Why would we want to ban him from participation? I don't think he has ever pushed the envelope on daily "contributions" as others have. Do I really need to hear from some of you three times a day or more? What makes you think that your contributions are more worthwhile? I agree that we should keep to the topic of teaching psychology, but most of the comments in this thread have been nothing but ad hominem. Those who have contributed to this thread should consider whether or not they are actually contributing to the mission of this group.
Bill Scott --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
