> Allen Esterson writes: > Re the imputing of motivations in relation to Jim Guinee's citing the > newspaper report on abortion and health, including of the study team, no > one seems to have thought it worth noting the views of the person > described as the team leader in the report: > > "Professor Fergusson, who supports unrestricted access to abortion and > describes himself as 'an atheist, a rationalist and pro-choice'... > 'There'll be cheering for our results on the pro-life side and denouncing > us angrily on the pro-choice side,' said Professor Fergusson, a > psychologist and epidemiologist at the Christchurch School of Medicine and > Health Sciences. 'Neither of those positions is sound'." > http://www.smh.com.au/news/health/abortion-linked-to-mental-problems/2006/01/02/1136050394322.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
Thank you for pointing that out! This is a good example of why any religious agenda could not be implied given that such an agenda is given a preemptive strike by Fergusson JMO JG --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
