But, I like Hall's definition!  And it is the definition for reflex that most 
introductory, and even some advanced textbooks, provide: A simple unlearned 
response to a stimulus.

>From the description provided by Schwarz, it seems as if he is using a 
>'looser' definition a la Skinner. But, yes, if you've already lost the ability 
>to swallow ... WTH ... The quote is confusing!!!

And thanks for the reference! Found it online via a simple Google search. ;-)

Miguel
________________________________________
From: Kenneth Steele [steel...@appstate.edu]
Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 10:20 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] A question and a comment

Hi Miguel:

Few people understand that one reason that people have so much difficulty with 
the term ‘reflex’ is that there are several definitions of the term in use.  
Most people seem to be using Marshall Hall’s definition (unconscious, 
unlearned, involuntary behavior).

I recommend Skinner (1931) ‘The concept of the reflex in the description of 
behavior’ J. Gen. Psych., 5, 427-458, to help unravel some of these uses.  Read 
his summary for the Cliff Notes version of the history.  (There are other 
histories, too.)

Back to your original question, the quote makes no sense.  If someone has a 
dysfunctional swallowing reflex then putting food into that person’s mouth is 
the worst thing you can do.  The likely outcome is that the person will 
aspirate the food or liquid and choke.

Ken


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  
steel...@appstate.edu<mailto:steel...@appstate.edu>
Professor
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Oct 7, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Miguel Roig 
<ro...@stjohns.edu<mailto:ro...@stjohns.edu>> wrote:

Good morning, here is question for your: I was reading this article on the lack 
of coverage of dementia situations in advance directives, 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/well/live/an-advance-directive-for-patients-with-dementia.html
 (an interesting read in its own right) when I came upon the following quote:  
“People should at least understand what the normal process of advanced dementia 
is about,” Dr. Schwarz said. “Feeding tubes are not the issue — they’re not 
done when dementia is terminal. Instead, a caregiver will stand patiently at 
the bedside and spoon food into your mouth as long as you open it. Opening your 
mouth when a spoon approaches is a primitive reflex that persists long after 
you’ve lost the ability to swallow and know what to do with what’s put in your 
mouth.”  My question: Is Schwarz referring to the rooting reflex? If so, isn't 
touching the cheek necessary for the reflex to be triggered and, if that is the 
case then, isn't what he is describing a learned behavior, even if its strength 
lies in it being grounded on an earlier reflex or something to that effect?  I 
would appreciate any clarification on this.

And now a comment or, really, a heads-up that is unrelated to the above 
question and perhaps not even real news to most of us: It concerns an article 
and a documentary about the high price of academic publishing. The article by 
Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ is freely available from the latest 
issue of the Lancet, though you need to register to get it, 
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)32353-5/fulltext.
 The article is based, in part on the documentary "Paywall". The video is over 
an hour long, but just the first 10 minutes will likely outrage even those who 
are already aware of the current state of academic publishing. You can check it 
out for free at: https://paywallthemovie.com/.

Miguel

This email may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged material for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or 
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the 
sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
steel...@appstate.edu<mailto:steel...@appstate.edu>.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39&n=T&l=tips&o=52866
or send a blank email to 
leave-52866-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-52866-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
ro...@stjohns.edu<mailto:ro...@stjohns.edu>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf851&n=T&l=tips&o=52867

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-52867-3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-52867-3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>

This email may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged material for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or 
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the 
sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=52868
or send a blank email to 
leave-52868-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to