Not that it matters, but I'm going to stick with Hall's definition. It's
much simpler that way and it's a much cleaner definition.


On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 3:19 PM Kenneth Steele <steel...@appstate.edu> wrote:

> Hi Miguel:
>
> This reply is not to beat on a colleague who has hit the sacred 3 post
> limit (two is too little, but four is too much).  But I will note that
> Pavlov spent much of his time/space in Lecture I (Pavlov, 1927) arguing
> against the distinction between reflexes (as simple rigid behavior
> patterns) and instincts (defined by James and McDougall as more complex,
> flexible behavior patterns ).  Pavlov’s solution was that the term “reflex”
> covered all such instances of rule-governed behavior.  My favorite example
> is Pavlov’s description of a dog showing a “freedom reflex” in Lecture I.
>
> Again, I am not saying that Pavlov has the correct solution but I am
> noting that textbook descriptions of the term reflex contradict both Pavlov
> and Skinner’s definition of the term, which I find to be an odd situation.
> I would be fine if textbook writers said to heck with Pavlov and Skinner’s
> definitions, I am going with Marshall Hall on this issue.  But most don’t
> seem aware of this issue.
>
>
> (My cerebrum has chosen voluntarily to suppress my spinal cord activity
> and send you) Best regards,
>
> Ken
>
>
> > On Oct 7, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Miguel Roig <ro...@stjohns.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Ken, I admit to have always (and I mean always) understood and explained
> reflexes using Hall's definition and I usually cover the topic in the
> chapters of development and also in the chapter of learning/conditioning,
> especially with respect to distinguishing reflexes from fixed action
> patterns. I suppose that such a simplistic definition may be, arguably,
> acceptable and even desirable in an introductory textbook but perhaps not
> for a more advanced learning course (I have not taught the latter in
> decades!). If, as you point out, this confusion still exists in the
> textbook literature, especially in learning texts, and no one has clarified
> it in recent years, I would think that an essay on the subject targeted to,
> say, Teaching of Psychology (ToP) would be welcomed and might even lead to
> desired changes in how authors address this important concept. Then, again,
> as the cases of Kitty Genovese and of Little Albert have shown over the
> years, some textbook authors don't seem to read ToP or similarly relevant
> literature!
> >
> > And I have now reached my quota of posts for today. Sigh ...
> >
> > Miguel
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Kenneth Steele [steel...@appstate.edu]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 1:04 PM
> > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> > Subject: Re: [tips] A question and a comment
> >
> > Hi Miguel:
> >
> > But here are some of the conundrums that you encounter with following
> the Marshall Hall pathway.
> >
> > If a reflex is a simple, unlearned response to a stimulus then why do we
> talk about conditioned reflexes as learned responses to a stimulus?  Is a
> reflex unlearned or learned?
> >
> > This position leads to the proposition that there are two kinds of
> reflexes: learned and unlearned.  Which leads to several questions.  Isn’t
> a learned reflex an oxymoron? How do you discriminate between the two type
> of reflexes?  How do you know that your unlearned reflex isn’t really a
> learned reflex, since you can’t see the history of its development?  (This
> issue was a favorite of the American Functionalists - the TC Schneirla
> crowd.)
> >
> > I see learning textbooks (and students) trap themselves in contradictory
> statements, leaving everybody confused.  I can point to specific paragraphs
> in learning textbooks which define a reflex as unlearned and then in the
> next sentence define a conditioned reflex as learned.  It is no wonder that
> students find classical conditioning as a confusing topic.
> >
> > You are correct that Hall’s definition is the most popular.  I send grad
> students on a hunt through their subfields to find the most common
> definition of a reflex and the Hall definition is the most popular,
> although Marshall Hall is almost unknown as a name in psychology. I am not
> saying that Skinner’s solution is the best but that textbooks have left
> students (and a bunch of faculty) feeling very confused.
> >
> > I am glad that you were able to find the article.  Google can be so
> helpful at times.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Miguel Roig <ro...@stjohns.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> But, I like Hall's definition!  And it is the definition for reflex
> that most introductory, and even some advanced textbooks, provide: A simple
> unlearned response to a stimulus.
> >>
> >> From the description provided by Schwarz, it seems as if he is using a
> 'looser' definition a la Skinner. But, yes, if you've already lost the
> ability to swallow ... WTH ... The quote is confusing!!!
> >>
> >> And thanks for the reference! Found it online via a simple Google
> search. ;-)
> >>
> >> Miguel
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Kenneth Steele [steel...@appstate.edu]
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 10:20 AM
> >> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> >> Subject: Re: [tips] A question and a comment
> >>
> >> Hi Miguel:
> >>
> >> Few people understand that one reason that people have so much
> difficulty with the term ‘reflex’ is that there are several definitions of
> the term in use.  Most people seem to be using Marshall Hall’s definition
> (unconscious, unlearned, involuntary behavior).
> >>
> >> I recommend Skinner (1931) ‘The concept of the reflex in the
> description of behavior’ J. Gen. Psych., 5, 427-458, to help unravel some
> of these uses.  Read his summary for the Cliff Notes version of the
> history.  (There are other histories, too.)
> >>
> >> Back to your original question, the quote makes no sense.  If someone
> has a dysfunctional swallowing reflex then putting food into that person’s
> mouth is the worst thing you can do.  The likely outcome is that the person
> will aspirate the food or liquid and choke.
> >>
> >> Ken
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  steel...@appstate.edu<mailto:
> steel...@appstate.edu>
> >> Professor
> >> Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
> >> Appalachian State University
> >> Boone, NC 28608
> >> USA
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> On Oct 7, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Miguel Roig <ro...@stjohns.edu<mailto:
> ro...@stjohns.edu>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Good morning, here is question for your: I was reading this article on
> the lack of coverage of dementia situations in advance directives,
> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/well/live/an-advance-directive-for-patients-with-dementia.html
> (an interesting read in its own right) when I came upon the following
> quote:  “People should at least understand what the normal process of
> advanced dementia is about,” Dr. Schwarz said. “Feeding tubes are not the
> issue — they’re not done when dementia is terminal. Instead, a caregiver
> will stand patiently at the bedside and spoon food into your mouth as long
> as you open it. Opening your mouth when a spoon approaches is a primitive
> reflex that persists long after you’ve lost the ability to swallow and know
> what to do with what’s put in your mouth.”  My question: Is Schwarz
> referring to the rooting reflex? If so, isn't touching the cheek necessary
> for the reflex to be triggered and, if that is the case then, isn't what he
> is describing a learned behavior, even if its strength lies in it being
> grounded on an earlier reflex or something to that effect?  I would
> appreciate any clarification on this.
> >>
> >> And now a comment or, really, a heads-up that is unrelated to the above
> question and perhaps not even real news to most of us: It concerns an
> article and a documentary about the high price of academic publishing. The
> article by Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ is freely available from
> the latest issue of the Lancet, though you need to register to get it,
> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)32353-5/fulltext.
> The article is based, in part on the documentary "Paywall". The video is
> over an hour long, but just the first 10 minutes will likely outrage even
> those who are already aware of the current state of academic publishing.
> You can check it out for free at: https://paywallthemovie.com/.
> >>
> >> Miguel
> >>
> >> This email may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> You are currently subscribed to tips as: steel...@appstate.edu<mailto:
> steel...@appstate.edu>.
> >> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39&n=T&l=tips&o=52866
> >> or send a blank email to
> leave-52866-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> <mailto:
> leave-52866-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> You are currently subscribed to tips as: ro...@stjohns.edu<mailto:
> ro...@stjohns.edu>.
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf851&n=T&l=tips&o=52867
> >>
> >> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is
> broken)
> >>
> >> or send a blank email to
> leave-52867-3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> <mailto:
> leave-52867-3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> >
> >>
> >> This email may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> You are currently subscribed to tips as: steel...@appstate.edu.
> >> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39&n=T&l=tips&o=52868
> >> or send a blank email to
> leave-52868-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> >
> >
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to tips as: ro...@stjohns.edu.
> > To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf851&n=T&l=tips&o=52869
> > or send a blank email to
> leave-52869-3343621.18283a1227eb73d1ce74b7f7163cf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> > This email may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
> >
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to tips as: steel...@appstate.edu.
> > To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39&n=T&l=tips&o=52870
> > or send a blank email to
> leave-52870-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: devoldercar...@gmail.com.
> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=177920.a45340211ac7929163a0216244443341&n=T&l=tips&o=52871
> or send a blank email to
> leave-52871-177920.a45340211ac7929163a0216244443...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>


-- 
Carol DeVolder, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
St. Ambrose University
518 West Locust Street
Davenport, Iowa  52803
563-333-6482

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=52872
or send a blank email to 
leave-52872-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to