On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 2:11 AM Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 01:54:18PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I am in favor of the substantive change proposed by this draft. > > > > However, I do not think that we should *adopt* this draft. > > draft-ietf-tls-edhe-mlkem-04 is currently in the RFC Editor Queue and we > > should simply change the IANA Considerations section of this draft prior to > > publication. I recognize this requires a new WGLC and a new IETF LC, but we > > can just do that now. Publishing a new RFC that does nothing other than > > change the IANA Considerations section in a document which has not yet been > > published is just unnecessary process. > > +1 to changing the IANA considerations of the soon-to-be-published draft > to promote X25519MLKEM768 to Recommended=Y.
+1. Anything else is spending electrons we don't need to, and doesn't speed anything up. > > -- > Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні! > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
