Henri Gomez wrote:
Second reference to mod_coyote ?
Should we retains this one ?
Maybe ;)
We have two connectors planned. This one will use AJP, while the other would use JNI, so we need two, different, non confusing names. So naming this mod_jk3 would be bad, just like naming the two mod_coyote1 and mod_coyote2.
So when will we get all these new shiny toys ? :)
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
