ralphpnj;577275 Wrote: > I agree with iPhone. Maybe I somehow missed it but when did a USB > connection become the most desirable one? Last thing I recall was > reading about what big pain in the neck USB connections where and how > much better it was to transmit the data via a network connection, > something about jitter and bit perfect but who knows. My feeling is > that JS did it just to see if it could be done and in an honest effort > to explore all possible ways of connecting a Touch.
OGS;577292 Wrote: > Yes, certainly! I've tried to make this work with my Touch, but no > sucess... Does this include support for async USB mode? > > .... ralphpnj and iPhone, have you actually listened to a Music > Streamer USB DAC, the Ayre or one of the other asynchronous USB dacs? > You should before you state things like this.... Sorry to have to quote myself but exactly where did I say anything about the sound of a USB connection? I'm fairly certain that a USB connection can be made to work as well as a SPDIF connection but as iPhione correctly points out why bother? It's not as if the Touch only has a USB connection. However now I guess we're going a long round of posts claiming that using the Touch with a USB connection is superior to using the SPDIF connection. Oh well, have fun. -- ralphpnj Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter -> Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82040 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch