Re: **Possible_Spam** Re: [TruthTalk] TEST

[Dave]

DAVEH:  Note.....I did not write the below 2 sentences in red that end with "mormon??? Izzy".     Izzy, I'm not sure why you think I'm bordering on making "repeat blasphemous accusations against the Lord".  I merely mentioned something I heard on a TV program that I thought was interesting.  Do you think it would have been a problem (from a Protestant's perspective) if Jesus had been married? ShieldsFamily wrote: DAVEH: So now you are going to repeat blasphemous accusations against the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, to try to bring him down to the level of your “messiah” Joe Smith, the adulterer? Isn’t that a bit low, even for a mormon??? Izzy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent:Sunday, December 14, 20031:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: **Possible_Spam** Re: [TruthTalk] TEST DAVEH:  Is that doctrinally (that he had not married) accepted by Protestants, Izzy?  Awhile back I watched a show on one of the arts channels (A&E, I think) about Jesus.  They suggested there was reason to believe he may have been married.  ShieldsFamily wrote:  Blaine; I hear the JS was rich in wives. Unlike Messiah, who had none. Izzy -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.