RE: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'

[ShieldsFamily]

Jt—ignore the hecklers. (My advice.) iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:30 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'   Soooo,  "infallibility" is the case except when two people who share that teaching disagree.  Then, the doctrine of "infallibility" does not apply  and the teaching of "maturity" carry's the force of law?    Wow !!  I think I am starting to get it!!   Jd    -----Original Message----- From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:49:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter' You never give up do you Lance? All this proves is that we are at different places in our walk. I have seen David explain this to you in the clearest way possible but you apparently did not accept that.  There is only ONE who has always been perfect.  The rest of us are learning and "rest" includes David and me.   On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:38:04 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: At last we've been presented with the opportunity to demonstrate this 'He will lead you into all truth' thingy is misunderstood by those who have most often cited it (Judy, David).   Both are faithful servants of the Lord, both have 'studied to show themselves approved', both are 'berean' in their approach....HOWEVER ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO WEASEL OUT IN THE END SANS A SATISFACTORY CONCLUSION! One is more committed to belief than reality.