On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 05:25:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote: > I like these color names better than the previously defined ones, but if > we're going to change the names of the colors, let's use the canonical > names, perhaps adopting the color names in /etc/X11/rgb.txt file.
Using 'canonical' names might be good, but we should also try to be kid-friendly above being too 'official.' > We may also have to retranslate the color names. Yes, the changed and new ones will need to be updated. > BTW, does changing the names of the color and ordering affect file > saving/loading? Nope! > Will reordering the palette inconvenience the users, and > if so, should we reorder them, and does the reordering make more intuitive > sense? (I haven't checked the new orders.) I think the new order will be more intuitive. > [snip] > > -#define MAX_STAMPS 256 > > +#define MAX_STAMPS 512 > [snip] > > If we're gonna increase the stamps, is 512 enough? What's our stamps > collection size? The collection is currently over 200. At some point, I'm going to break them up into sub-collections which kids can choose to load, rather than loading ALL of them at once... So a large number like 512 is probably more than sufficient. > [snip] > > #ifndef WIN32 > > - if (Mix_OpenAudio(44100, AUDIO_S16, 2, 1024) < 0) > > + if (Mix_OpenAudio(44100, AUDIO_S16SYS, 2, 1024) < 0) > > #else > > if (Mix_OpenAudio(44100, AUDIO_S16, 2, 2048) < 0) > > #endif > > This change is for Mac, right? Does this change negatively affect Linux > and/or BeOS (or Sun, etc.)? I'll commit it for now, and see what the packagers/porters have to say. -bill! _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
