Ed, I would like to re-read your blog post, but it's redirecting me through oAuth into Twitoaster???
On 6 April 2010 01:08, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <zn...@comcast.net> wrote: > On 04/05/2010 09:47 AM, Dewald Pretorius wrote: > > +1 ^ 10. Very well said, Ed. You're getting an enthusiastic standing > > ovation and one-man Mexican wave from me. > > I think as a community, we're letting a golden opportunity for > discussion about Twitter Search pass us by while we "vent" and "rant" > about the inconveniences and about "roles" and "titles". I'm not by any > means an expert on search in the large, although I do spend a fair > amount of time trying to keep up with the natural language processing > and computational linear algebra technologies that power search. > > But I think the discussion we *should* be having is not about the > mechanics of the API, the logistics of API versioning, "developer best > practices" or roles withing the community. I don't even think it should > be about business models, although that's certain a part of it. I think > the discussion we should be having is about Twitter Search itself - how > it should work to meet the needs of the two classes of users I call > "seekers" and "sellers". I posted a call for this discussion on my blog > a while back, but haven't had many takers. So here it is again: > > > http://borasky-research.net/2010/03/19/seeker-or-seller-what-do-you-think-about-adding-popularity-to-twitter-search-tweetsearchpop/ > > If there's enough interest, maybe we can put together an "unconference" > session on this at Chirp. > > -- > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > borasky-research.net/m-edward-ed-borasky > > "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul > Erdős > > > -- > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. >
