Dewald,

Thanks for the clarification.  What you're saying makes sense and is
in
line with what Ryan was saying.  I hope you're right.


On May 27, 2:35 pm, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mo,
>
> I think the word "injected" is causing the confusion. As I understand
> it it means:
>
> - I pull a list of tweets from the API into an array.
> - Before displaying the list to the user, I "inject" entries that look
> like tweets (but are actually entries I get paid to display) into that
> array.
> - Then I display the list to the user making it look as if everything
> in the list came from Twitter.
>
> As I said, that's how I understand it. But with that understanding, it
> does not make sense why Dick was going on about the infrastructure
> cost of Twitter, because this injection does not impact Twitter's
> infrastructure at all. It all happens exclusively on the application's
> server or the desktop or mobile device.
>
> Anyway, hopefully at some point in time there will be an authoritative
> and unambiguous explanation from Twitter.
>
> On May 27, 10:16 am, Mo <maur...@moluv.com> wrote:
>
> > Taylor,
>
> > I'm glad Twitter thought to do this, but it still doesn't explain as
> > clearly as Ryan's post here about what's acceptable and what's not.
>
> > Not Acceptable:
> > "Paid Tweets injected into any timeline on a service that leverages
> > the Twitter API (other than Promoted Tweets). This applies to any
> > Twitter stream, whether user based, search based, or other."
>
> > This makes it sound like Ryan was wrong, and actually confuses the
> > issue again.
>
> > From Ryan:
> > "This policy also *does not prohibit* services like Ad.ly that help
> > facilitate those relationships or even help her post the ads to her
> > timeline
> > on her behalf. "
>
> > These sound like they are conflicting.  Is Ryan correct, or not?
>
> > What would also be helpful is a link to information on how the
> > Promoted Tweets rev share works.
>
> > On May 26, 9:20 am, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Hello Everyone,
>
> > > We recently updated our Advertising FAQ to answer many of the
> > > questions that you may have.http://bit.ly/twitter-ad-faq
>
> > > Taylor
>
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Liz <nwjersey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I hope some answers are forthcoming, James. Twitter doesn't seem very
> > > > talkative.
>
>

Reply via email to