Alle 22:21 del 3/11/2009, Matthew East ha scritto: > I would suggest that the team get together to discuss requirements > that each project should have, a process for discussing and approving > them, people involved, and then most importantly, implementing them!
Exactly. That's what we did in Italian Team. We started from the idea of "what to do" and "how". And we wrote down a list of all possible projects. Then we moved on finding "who" could drive and help each project. After a while leaders naturally emerge from people involved in driving projects. You don't need to define leaders before to start to do stuff, they comes naturally doing stuff. I partecipate in the foundation of the NGO team, last UDS. We started working and we already did a lot of things but nobody posted a question about who's the leader of the project. Why should do we care here? Let's discuss *what* to do and *who* can help in what. About the IRC Meeting, we live across several time zones. Do we really need to meet in a channel at the same time for define what to do? And if we need, why we don't do a poll about time frame availability before defining the meeting? Ciao -- Paolo Sammicheli EMail: xdatap1(at)ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/~xdatap1 - Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
