Hi, I'm totally aware of that, but the performance are just not what it should, how could waiting aknowlegment on gigabit network
On 29 Jan 2010 15:48, "a b" <tripivceta at hotmail.com> wrote: The same operation runs so fast through SMB because SMB is returning back with acknowledgment that I/O completed, whereas in reality the I/O might still be flying to disk, and might not even have made it to stable storage. In other words, SMB is lying to the I/O requestor. NFS, on the other hand, is POSIX compliant, and that means that it must absolutely and with no ifs, buts, or maybes commit the I/O to disk before it may acknowledge that the I/O request completed. In other words, lying is not allowed. Read all about it here: http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:54:25 +0100 From: [email protected] To: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org Subject: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance Hi there, When i say bad, this is really bad... I'm sharing a dataset trough zfs sharenfs. I conn... ------------------------------ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> _______________________________________________ Switzerland OpenSolaris Mailing List ug-chosug at opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ug-chosug wiki: http://wikis.sun.com/display/chosug LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=161188&trk=hb_side_g ISO images: http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/opensolaris.org/release_isos/ IPS: http://ips.osug.ch:10000/release/ Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31224908 at N08 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/aa2e0a42/attachment-0001.html>
