On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, a b <tripivceta at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  You are reporting 48MB/s over SMB, and that's with "lying", and I'm seeing
> 12MB/s I/Os making it to the disk on my ZFS NFS server, and that's with a
> much older system and "no lying", so it seems to me that both observations
> correspond to expected behavior/performance.
>
> I guess you could reframe the question: how many MB/s do you expect from
> ZFS + NFS? 48, like for CIFS/SMB?  How many MB/s are you getting now?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:06:42 +0100
> Subject: Re: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance
>
> From: oliver.mauras at gmail.com
> To: tripivceta at hotmail.com
> CC: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org
>
>
> Sorry bad reply...
> So how could waiting I/Os to commit on a drive array capable of 180MB write
> on gigabit network could drop performances that bad??? That's just wrong...
> i never had that kind of bad performances even with the worst pata drive
> over 100mb network....
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it 
> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Switzerland OpenSolaris Mailing List
> ug-chosug at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ug-chosug
> wiki: http://wikis.sun.com/display/chosug
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=161188&trk=hb_side_g
> ISO images:
> http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/opensolaris.org/release_isos/
> IPS: http://ips.osug.ch:10000/release/
> Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31224908 at N08
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/5cfb76f8/attachment-0001.html>

Reply via email to