On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, a b <tripivceta at hotmail.com> wrote:
> You are reporting 48MB/s over SMB, and that's with "lying", and I'm seeing > 12MB/s I/Os making it to the disk on my ZFS NFS server, and that's with a > much older system and "no lying", so it seems to me that both observations > correspond to expected behavior/performance. > > I guess you could reframe the question: how many MB/s do you expect from > ZFS + NFS? 48, like for CIFS/SMB? How many MB/s are you getting now? > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:06:42 +0100 > Subject: Re: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance > > From: oliver.mauras at gmail.com > To: tripivceta at hotmail.com > CC: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org > > > Sorry bad reply... > So how could waiting I/Os to commit on a drive array capable of 180MB write > on gigabit network could drop performances that bad??? That's just wrong... > i never had that kind of bad performances even with the worst pata drive > over 100mb network.... > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it > now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> > > _______________________________________________ > Switzerland OpenSolaris Mailing List > ug-chosug at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ug-chosug > wiki: http://wikis.sun.com/display/chosug > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=161188&trk=hb_side_g > ISO images: > http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/opensolaris.org/release_isos/ > IPS: http://ips.osug.ch:10000/release/ > Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31224908 at N08 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/5cfb76f8/attachment-0001.html>
