You are reporting 48MB/s over SMB, and that's with "lying", and I'm
seeing12MB/s I/Os making it to the disk on my ZFS NFS server, and that's with
amuch older system and "no lying", so it seems to me that both
observationscorrespond to expected behavior/performance.
I guess you could reframe the question: how many MB/s do you expect fromZFS +
NFS? 48, like for CIFS/SMB? How many MB/s are you getting now?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:06:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance
From: [email protected]
To: tripivceta at hotmail.com
CC: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org
Sorry bad reply...
So how could waiting I/Os to commit on a drive array capable of 180MB write on
gigabit network could drop performances that bad??? That's just wrong... i
never had that kind of bad performances even with the worst pata drive over
100mb network....
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/d42cf277/attachment.html>
