Sorry bad reply... So how could waiting I/Os to commit on a drive array capable of 180MB write on gigabit network could drop performances that bad??? That's just wrong... i never had that kind of bad performances even with the worst pata drive over 100mb network....
Regards, Olivier On 29 Jan 2010 16:01, "Mauras Olivier" <oliver.mauras at gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I'm totally aware of that, but the performance are just not what it should, how could waiting aknowlegment on gigabit network > > On 29 Jan 2010 15:48, "a b" <tripivceta at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > The same operation runs so fast through SMB because SMB is returning back > with acknowledgment ... > > ________________________________ > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:54:25 +0100 > From: oliver.mauras at g... Hi there, When i say bad, this is really bad... I'm sharing a dataset trough zfs sharenfs. I conn... > > > ________________________________ > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. > _______________________________________________ > Switzerland OpenSolaris Mailing List > ug-chosug... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/f4d04cf0/attachment.html>
