No way am I going to tell you that, 2MB/s is busted, no ifs, buts, or maybes. Do you have any other clients which connect to the NFS server? What does theirperformance look like?Can you pinpoint the performance problem to OS X NFS client? Is it possible to connect the client and the server directly via a CAT5 crossover cable,to rule the network equipment out? Have you tried DTracing the NFS server? I'd take Brendan Gregg's DTrace toolkit and goto town on the NFS server, unless you can actually prove that there is a problem withthe OS X NFS client <---> SunOS NFS server. Is there anything in /var/adm/messages on the NFS server, NFS related, RPC related,possibly NIC related? Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:31:21 +0100 Subject: Re: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance From: [email protected] To: tripivceta at hotmail.com CC: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org
God i should stop sending mail from the smartphone... Sorry bad replies. So to reframe the questions, how many MB/s do i expect: Around 35MB/s or more ... This is the least i have on similar setups.. How many do i have now: Around 2MB/s .... Please don't tell me this is normal "not lying" performance. Regards, Olivier On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Mauras Olivier <oliver.mauras at gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, a b <tripivceta at hotmail.com> wrote: You are reporting 48MB/s over SMB, and that's with "lying", and I'm seeing12MB/s I/Os making it to the disk on my ZFS NFS server, and that's with amuch older system and "no lying", so it seems to me that both observations correspond to expected behavior/performance. I guess you could reframe the question: how many MB/s do you expect fromZFS + NFS? 48, like for CIFS/SMB? How many MB/s are you getting now? Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:06:42 +0100 Subject: Re: [ug-chosug] [NFS] Zfs sharenfs bad performance From: [email protected] To: tripivceta at hotmail.com CC: ug-chosug at opensolaris.org Sorry bad reply... So how could waiting I/Os to commit on a drive array capable of 180MB write on gigabit network could drop performances that bad??? That's just wrong... i never had that kind of bad performances even with the worst pata drive over 100mb network.... Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. _______________________________________________ Switzerland OpenSolaris Mailing List ug-chosug at opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ug-chosug wiki: http://wikis.sun.com/display/chosug LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=161188&trk=hb_side_g ISO images: http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/opensolaris.org/release_isos/ IPS: http://ips.osug.ch:10000/release/ Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31224908 at N08 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-chosug/attachments/20100129/1855c871/attachment.html>
