10.1 will run on a 601 processor if you really want to harm yourself ... in comparison a 604 200MHz does very well.

I have seen X run on a 300MHz 604e and it ran far better than I thought it would. Its useable if you don't use too many apps at one time. It wasn't as bad as you described.

David

On Jan 2, 2004, at 5:50 PM, Peter da Silva wrote:

The 7500 has a 200MHz 604e upgrade, 128MB of RAM and three PCI slots,
none of them in use.

Oh, I missed this.


10.1.5 *will* run on a 604e, but it is agonisingly slow. You really
really really need a G3 if you're going to use this for anything but
proving it's possibl.

I installed 10.1 on a 180 MHz 604e, it took 20 hours to install.

Opening a program, any program, took half a minute. Once it was up, the
GUI was amazingly responsive so long as you didn't do things like try and
use menus (oops), but it was NOT usable.


--
Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>

Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com



Reply via email to