> 10.1 will run on a 601 processor if you really want to harm yourself > ... in comparison a 604 200MHz does very well.
I didn't think it'd run on a 601. I do know what it's like on a CPU about the speed the original poster has, and I was also amazed how well it ran... but that doesn't mean I'd consider it usable. 20 hours for the install and thirty seconds for windows to open wasn't exaggeration: I timed it. For something like iTunes, if that's all you ran, I think it would work. I think it would cost more to make it anything but painful than it would be worth. Pity they didn't stick with Openstep/Rhapsody. I'm running NS3 on a 68040/25 (Mono slab) and it's zippy. -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
