Sounds fair. If we can get the reorderer all set up, we can move to dojo 1.0. I just solved the last problem with the dialog menus (which actually turned out to be a dojo bug). The new version of dojo should be faster and give us access to all the new shininess dojo's added in the last year or so.
- Jen On Jan 14, 2008 4:01 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With Jen's reply in mind I think the answer is 'yes' The Reorderer can > assume this and other 'complex' logic will be already completed and > provided in the JSON. The nice thing about this is even if it isn't > there right away it can be added by simply a bit more logic portal-side. > > -Eric > > Anastasia Cheetham wrote: > > > >> Anastasia Cheetham wrote: > > > >>> Assuming that locked portlets can exist in any column, can they be > >>> moved between columns? > > > > Gary answered: > > > >> Locked portlets can only be moved by privileged users (likely admins). > > > > This might be a question for Jen, who is working on the code to > > generate the JSON object: > > > > Currently, the plan is for the portal to inform the Reorderer of > > permissions (what can be moved where) through a JSON object, shielding > > the Reorderer from needing to know things about locking and priorities > > directly. > > > > Jen, can the Reorderer assume that the JSON object will take into > > account varying permissions between classes of users (e.g. that admins > > can move locked portlets and regular users cannot)? > > > -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
