I was actually reviewing that last night and saw that there is a
significant overlap with some of the indexes you proposed.  I agree, we
should work together to accomplish this as it sounds like we have many
similar goals and ideas.  

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 20:09 +0100, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Thanks for taking up the glove and perhaps you want to take a look to my
> proposal to restructure the wiki(s) and can join forces as my initiative
> hasn't gained much thrust yet. There are also two attachments available with
> all the current documents:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Wiki+Reorganization+Proposal
> 
> Jeroen van der Wal
> Stromboli b.v.
> +31 655 874050
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:59 PM, bsreekanth <babu.sreeka...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Matt,
> >   good beginning.. I have some thoughts.
> > 1. We may delete (if Jaques, etc agrees) the older pages once we compile it
> > it into the new ones. Ideally there should only be one source for the same
> > information, otherwise it leads to conflict over the course, hard to
> > maintain etc.
> > 2. It would be great if someone know the system well to do a quick review
> > of
> > the pages. David wrote many tutorials (entity engine, service engine,
> > framework training etc), but they dated 2006. I think most of the contents
> > are accurate, but any outdated info makes it hard to  fully rely on it, and
> > you have to wait till you fully understand the system to believe in it
> > (well
> > that's the way I think. some people may smart enough to weed out it
> > earlier)
> > Babu.
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://n4.nabble.com/Nice-job-on-keeping-the-download-site-up-to-date-tp1470517p1471994.html
> > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >


-- 
Matt Warnock <mwarn...@ridgecrestherbals.com>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

Reply via email to